🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.